Professional Selection Guides & Technical Insights
Short Answer: The core of industrial encoder selection lies in understanding the fundamental differences between incremental and absolute types. Incremental encoders measure relative displacement through pulse counting — low cost, fast response, suitable for speed control and relative positioning. Absolute encoders assign a unique code value to each position, requiring no homing after power loss, suitable for safety-critical scenarios and high-precision positioning. Selection should consider resolution, output interface, protection rating, and budget.
Industrial encoders are core sensors that convert rotary motion or linear displacement into electrical signals, widely used in CNC machines, robotics, elevators, wind power, packaging machinery, and other fields. Based on working principle and output method, encoders are primarily divided into two types: incremental encoders and absolute encoders.
The core role of an encoder is to provide precise position, speed, and direction feedback to the control system. Whether for closed-loop control of servo motors or synchronous positioning of conveyor belts, encoders play an indispensable role. Understanding the differences between the two types is the first step in selection.
Structurally, encoders typically consist of a light source, a coded disc, photoelectric receivers, and signal processing circuits. Incremental encoder discs have equally spaced transparent and opaque stripes, while absolute encoder discs have multiple concentric tracks with different encoding patterns. This structural difference directly determines their fundamentally different working principles and application characteristics.
Incremental encoder discs have evenly distributed transparent and opaque graduation lines. As the encoder shaft rotates, the photoelectric receiver detects changes in light transmission and outputs a series of pulse signals. Typical outputs include Phase A, Phase B (90° phase difference for direction detection), and Phase Z (one reference pulse per revolution). The controller calculates rotation angle, speed, and direction by counting pulses and detecting phase relationships.
Since incremental encoders only output pulses of relative change, they do not store absolute position information internally. After each power-up or power loss, a homing operation is required to establish a position reference. This is the most fundamental difference between incremental and absolute types.
Absolute encoder discs have multiple concentric tracks, each representing a binary bit. At any angular position, the code combination read by the photoelectric receivers is unique — like assigning an "ID number" to each angle. This means even after power loss and restart, the encoder can immediately output the current exact position without needing a homing operation.
Absolute encoders are divided into single-turn and multi-turn types. Single-turn types can only record absolute position within one revolution (360°); multi-turn types use internal gear trains or electronic counting to record the number of turns, covering ranges of thousands of revolutions, particularly suitable for long-stroke linear motion conversion scenarios (e.g., lead screws, lifting platforms).
| Comparison Dimension | Incremental Encoder | Absolute Encoder |
|---|---|---|
| Resolution | 100-10,000 PPR (up to 40,000 with multiplication) | Single-turn 12-25 bit, multi-turn up to 37 bit |
| Cost | Low, approx. ¥300-2,000 at equivalent resolution | Higher, approx. ¥800-8,000 |
| Power Loss Memory | Not supported; requires homing | Supported; no homing needed |
| Anti-Interference | Pulse loss may cause cumulative errors | Strong; unique position codes, less susceptible to interference |
| Max Speed | 10,000-12,000 RPM | 3,000-6,000 RPM |
| Output Interface | HTL, TTL/RS422, Sin/Cos | SSI, BiSS, EnDat, PROFINET, EtherCAT |
| Size | Smaller, min. ~Φ15mm | Larger, typically Φ36mm and above |
| Application Scenarios | Speed control, relative positioning, cost-sensitive projects | Absolute positioning, safety-critical, long stroke, multi-axis synchronization |
Resolution determines the positioning accuracy of the encoder. Incremental encoder resolution is typically expressed in PPR (Pulses Per Revolution), with common ranges of 100-10,000 PPR. Through 4x frequency multiplication, actual equivalent resolution can reach 4x. Absolute encoder resolution is expressed in bits, with single-turn 12-17 bit being common specifications, and multi-turn types can provide an additional 12 bits of turn counting.
Selection Recommendation: General servo positioning recommends incremental 1,000-2,500 PPR or absolute 17 bit; high-precision CNC machining recommends absolute 20 bit or above.
Common incremental encoder output methods include: HTL (push-pull, 10-30V, strong anti-interference), TTL/RS422 (line driver, 5V, suitable for long-distance transmission), Sin/Cos (analog, 1Vpp, suitable for high-precision interpolation). Absolute encoders primarily use digital interfaces: SSI (synchronous serial, point-to-point), BiSS (open-source high-speed protocol), EnDat (Heidenhain proprietary), and industrial Ethernet interfaces supporting PROFINET/EtherCAT.
Selection Recommendation: Regular applications recommend HTL or RS422 incremental; scenarios requiring industrial network integration or long-distance transmission recommend absolute + PROFINET/EtherCAT.
The encoder's protection rating directly affects its reliability and lifespan in different environments. Common ratings include: IP50 (indoor clean environments), IP64 (dust-proof and splash-proof), IP67 (fully dust-proof, short-term immersion), IP69K (high-pressure high-temperature water wash).
Selection Recommendation: General workshops recommend IP64 or above; food & beverage and outdoor equipment recommend IP67; food processing lines requiring CIP/SIP cleaning recommend IP69K.
Encoder mounting methods are primarily divided into solid shaft (connected via coupling) and hollow shaft/blind bore (directly fitted onto the motor shaft). Solid shaft is suitable for general installation, while hollow shaft offers compact structure and reduced axial space requirements. Additionally, shaft diameter (common 6mm, 10mm, 12mm), flange type (clamping flange, synchro flange), and cable exit direction (radial or axial) should be considered.
Selection Recommendation: Servo motor matching prioritizes hollow shaft type (better compatibility); independent installation or retrofit projects choose solid shaft + flexible coupling.
In actual projects, encoder selection is not simply an either-or choice, but requires comprehensive decision-making based on specific application scenarios, control requirements, budget, and installation conditions. Here are some practical recommendations we've compiled:
Ruilianxin Technology maintains long-term partnerships with established European and American encoder brands such as wenglor, SICK, BALLUFF, and Micronor, providing genuine import procurement services for both incremental and absolute encoders. Whether standard models or special customization needs, we offer professional selection advice and competitive pricing.
Tell our technical team your application scenario and control requirements, and we'll recommend the right encoder solution for you.
Consult Technical Team